Uwe E. Reinhardt is an economics professor at Princeton. In response to my last postreaders left several provocative comments on the profits earned by commercial health insurance companies — provocative in the sense that they provoke me to elaborate. Before proceeding, readers may wish to click on this link shown above and print out the income statement. That statement is fairly typical of a large insurer selling mainly group-insurance policies to relatively large employers. WellPoint Inc. Income statements are part of the annual reports called a K that every publicly traded company must submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Of that, Traditionally, actuaries had called this fraction the medical loss ratio M.
The insurance industry survives on premiums, but it thrives on float. Most insurance companies hope to just break even when they write your policy; the upside comes from the investment returns they earn while holding on to your money. In this segment from the Industry Focus: Financials podcast, The Motley Fool’s Gaby Lapera and Jordan Wathen discuss why the insurance industry loves taking in your premiums — it’s all about the «float. Gaby Lapera: There also are other types of insurers that are super niche-y, I guess. And if you go to their website, they have this whole list of things that they insure. They insure everything from your children’s birthday party to blacksmith shops and boats and RVs and all that normal stuff too. It’s crazy, they’re all over the board. Jordan Wathen: Right, right. Insurers especially tend to make better investments in some of the more common types of insurance, because they tend to be specialized, so there’s fewer competitors. Markel is a great case in investing insurance companies, because they’ve absolutely trumped every other I shouldn’t every other, but they trump most insurance companies. It’s not because they’re great at underwriting, they also have a spectacular investor, Tom Gayner. Lapera: Okay, let’s actually talk about that.
Go On, Tell Us What You Think!
Insurance companies make their money in two different ways. I think the most intuitive ways that most people would guess that insurance companies make their money, is by paying out less in claims than they take in in premiums. I think that’s pretty standard, run of the mill. Premiums, just in case you don’t pay insurance for whatever reason, maybe you’re 16 and don’t pay insurance, but you do invest. Your premium is what you pay to the insurance company so that you are insured every month, and then claims are what the insurance company pays out to people. Wathen: Right, absolutely. I think most people do assume that insurance companies make money from their underwriting, as in they generate more in premiums than they pay out in losses and expenses, but for the most part that’s absolutely not true.
Go On, Tell Us What You Think!
What happens if your car crashes or your house burns down or your baggage gets lost on your next flight or you are diagnosed with a critical illness whose treatment is going to cost you tons of money? Will you dig deep into your coffers every time such a crisis occurs? The human race has invented a sort of fantastic concept called insurance over its history and it has been an absolute life-saver for people all over the world. Unless you have been living under a rock all your life, you would most probably know what insurance is. The dictionary defines insurance as —. An arrangement by which a company or the state i. Insurance has been around for centuries. Hundreds of years ago, when ships used to get destroyed and sailors used to lose their cargo, they came up with the idea that by dividing the cargo among ships, they can divide their risk too.
Motley Fool Returns
One of the common criticisms leveled at private health insurance companies is that they are profiting at the expense of sick people. But let’s take a closer look at the data and see where it takes us. Do private health insurance companies really make unreasonable profits? Before addressing the question about profits, it’s important to look at how common having private health insurance really is in the United States. In other words, how many people might be affected by this question. According to Kaiser Family Foundation data, roughly a third of Americans had public health insurance in mostly Medicare and Medicaid. Nearly half of Americans have coverage provided by an employer, although 60 percent of them have coverage that’s partially or fully self-funded by the employer that means the employer has its own fund for covering medical costs, rather than purchasing coverage from a health insurance carrier; in most cases, the employer contracts with a commercial insurance company to administer the benefits—so the enrollees might have plan ID cards that say Humana or Anthem, for example—but it’s the employer’s money that’s being used to pay the claims, as opposed to the insurance company’s money. But many Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries also have coverage that’s provided via a private health insurance company, despite the fact that they are enrolled in publicly-funded health care plans. Thirty-three percent of Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans run by private health insurance carriers. Even among Original Medicare beneficiaries, a quarter have Medigap plans purchased from private health insurance carriers and this number is increasing it increased 6 percent from to alone. When we put all that together, it’s clear that a significant number of Americans have health coverage that’s provided or managed by a private health insurance company. And private health insurance companies tend to get a bad rap when it comes to healthcare costs.
Whatever is fine — but why should people have to buy insurance at all? It keeps us stress-free and relaxed and also provides the insurance companies the money to invest and keep the economy running. This is so because most of the revenue comes from the interest that is generated from investing the premium money in safe, short-term assets. The insurance companies operate like casinos and know that they have the odds in their favor and even if there are an overwhelming number of claims in one year, it shall balance out in the coming year. By examining the income statements of other insurers, readers can verify for themselves that the percentages calculated above do vary for a given company over time and also among different companies at any point in time. Compare All. If one insurer adopts this strategy then even the most public minded, not for profit, insurer must follow suit or be forced out of business by the marketplace. Uwe E. That’s a great money-making proposition for insurance companies. Close dialog. Corruption runs deep in this country, void of humanity. If capitalism and competition are so great, why are the insurance companies so afraid of a single payer or public option system? The premium is decided by pricing that risk using sophisticated algorithms and statistical tools which vary across companies and types of insurance. Trifecta Stocks.
Life Insurance 101
How can they help the medical system to lower its overhead? Feeds Google Maps vs. Income statements are part of the annual reports called a K that every publicly traded company must submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission. All too often, consumers fail to keep current on their insurance policies, which triggers a profitable scenario for the insurance company. As you found this post useful It might seem muhc to you but the insurance companies arrive at the premium amount after careful research and estimations so that the premium collected every year from all people is slightly more insuranc what they have to disburse at the time of claim. Preferred Stocks. Coverage Lapses All too often, consumers fail to keep current on their insurance policies, which triggers a profitable scenario for the insurance company. Up to half the premium can go for these non-medical items. Employee Compayns. That sets insurance companies far apart from traditional businesses. At the end of the day, insurance is a volume game. Bond Funds. About Sourobh Recent Posts.
Understanding the Profit Margin of Private Health Insurers
Uwe E. Reinhardt is an economics professor at Princeton. In response to my last postreaders left several provocative comments on the profits earned by commercial health insurance companies — provocative in the sense that they provoke me to elaborate. Before proceeding, readers may wish to click on this link shown above and print out the makr statement.
That statement is fairly typical of a large insurer selling mainly group-insurance policies to relatively large employers. WellPoint Inc. Income statements insurajce part of the annual reports called a K that every publicly traded company must submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Of that, Traditionally, actuaries had called this fraction the medical loss ratio M. Because that terminology comes across as indelicate, however, the preferred term now is the mellower health benefit ratio H.
Marketing and Administrative Expenses, or S. In this case, S. In it was 5. It depends how we look at it. Profits were not that big a deal as a fraction of premium revenue. It is here that the health insurance industry is being challenged to search for economies. Relative to other industries, these are not particularly high numbers, nor are they particularly low. By examining the income statements of other insurers, readers can verify for themselves that the companjs calculated above do vary for a given company over time and also among different companies at any point in time.
The comparable income statement of Aetna, Inc. Up to half the premium can go for these non-medical items. It is the reason why that market urgently needs to reformed. The same increases are demonstrated how much money does insurance companys make benefit payouts.
What changed between and that allowed for much lower increases in both premiums and payouts. Did their subscriber base decrease? Was there a correlation between the increased administrative expenses and the reduced rate of premium and payout increases?
If so, did the denial of claims factor into the lower medical payouts? Did reimbursement rates increase or decrease? Further, was there a significant change in medical loss ratios between the time the time the companies went from a non-profit to a for-profit corporation?
Their actual value added is just 1 or 2 percent of that, as a management fee. If capitalism and competition are so great, why are the insurance companies so afraid of a single payer or public option system? How much do the private system executives make?
How can they help the medical system to lower its overhead? Nor would it have to deny claims or rescind policies, or exclude people with existing medical conditions damn near every human being makee Earth past the age of about 2 weeks.
Medicare for everyone! Your native country in spent about half of what we do, per person, on health care. How about addressing that fact, and how we might approach cutting our costs in half? I find it exceedingly difficult to believe that the insurance companies profit margin is in the single digits.
The bottom-line is that having health-care providers and insurers whose 1 priority is a profit motive is always going to be a problem. Unlike most progressives I do not believe that excessive profit is the issue with Health Insurance. Rather the problem is that we are allowing competition among financial sector firms to determine the shape of our health care. Firms staffed with actuaries and accountants will seek actuarial and accounting solutions to the problem of medical costs.
In the heyday of the HMO they did this by lowering contracted payments to doctors and hospitals and pushing risk onto doctors and hospitals through capitation.
When this provoked public outrage, insurance companies hit upon the simple strategy of offering health insurance with deductibles and out of pocket costs insuance high that most consumers never meet their deductible and most families are at risk of medical bankruptcy in the event of serious illness.
If one insurer adopts this strategy then even the most public minded, not for profit, insurer must follow suit or be forced out of business by the marketplace. We need to understand that health care is not a financial service. We need to restrict Health Insurers so that they provide a simple service with no fancy insudance to manipulate the market or providers. Once we have done this we need to reorganize the production of health care to give doctors and hospitals the power and the incentives to compajys the cost of quality treatment.
Whatever is fine — but why should people have to buy insurance at all? Marketing costs are the most important reason for reform? That statement says it all. Corruption runs deep in this country, void of humanity. The slide into second-world country status continues…. It would also be useful to compare the performance of these for-profit health insurers with that of their purportedly not-for-profit counterparts. The IRS used by not-for-profits provides almost no transparency and the lag time allowed for reporting ensures that really bad practices are allowed to perpetuate.
I think an objective comparison would be helpful — is the free market indeed more efficient or not? Commercial enterprises, on the other hand, through money around willy nilly with no purpose what so. Oh, wait …. A physician and a senior entirely satisfied with my medical care with Medicare Parts A, B, and D plus a supplement to cover deductibles I support extending it to everyone financed by removing the income cap on Social Security taxes.
I worked hard to support Obama. As Bill Maher so eloquently has said: without a public option in any health care reform, the insurance companies will have gotten their dream blow job.
Another is its tendency to hire trained medical professionals, often at higher pay and with better working conditions than are available in the medical care industry, to do this dirty work. The insurers drain insyrance talent that could be providing care, and put them to work denying care.
The perverse incentives of a fractionalized, profit-based health care system are manifold. Thanks Dr. Reinhardt for doing these types of exercises. Ask yourself this same question about your annual cell phone. How can I cut my cell phone expense in half? Use half as much…. You need to doees really careful before savaging the health insurers over profit margins. Read this sentence from the article carefully:.
That means Assume they could do all that for 5. In fact, most health insurers make a fraction of. Insurers are essentially asset managers and hedge funds…. If people realized they were sending in their medical insueance to Goldman Sachs or Morgan Stanley, they would change their minds. Thats the biggest joke in healthcare…. Marketing for health insurance companies? Very few people have a real choice between companies. It kind of reminds me of something my mom recently told me.
She lives in a small town and they recently privatized their water and power company. Now rates have gone up and the company a monopoly! What is eye opening is that marketing insurance plans was almost four times and general administrative expenses more than 15 times reimbursed drug cost.
What would you rather have — a life-saving cancer treatment or another TV ad promoting a health insurance company that is going to do its best to prevent you from getting that medication? See next articles. Tom Bloom. Comments are no longer being accepted. There is something deeply doees about the way these measures are done for insurance companies. We will not get there as long as we let the Insurance companies lead. Population contol :!
A few points: 1 While only 6. Davis Liu, M. Look forward to your posts. Use half as much… Everything else is just window dressing i. You need to look at Combined Doees. If an insurers ratio is below it makes cmpanys, above it loses, and at its breakeven. The Universal Ratio adds the Invetsment Returns to true it up.
The concept that drives the insurance company revenue model is a business arrangement with an individual, company or organization where the insurer promises to pay a specific amount of money for a specific asset loss by the insured, usually by damage, illness, or in the case of life insurance, death. In return, the insurance company is paid umch usually monthly payments from its customer, for an insurance policy that covers life, home, auto, travel, business, and valuables, insjrance other assets. Basically, the insurance contract is a promise by the insurance company to pay out for any losses to the insured across a variety of asset spectrums, in exchange for regular, smaller payments made by the insured to the insurance company. The promise is cemented in an insurance contract, signed by both the insurance company and the insured customer.
Boost from government health plans
That sounds easy enough, right? But when you get down to how insurance companies make money, i. Let’s clear the air and examine how insurance companies make money, and how and why their risk-based revenue has proven so profitable over the years. As an insurance company is a for-profit enterprise, it has to create an internal business model mucu collects more cash than it pays out to customers, while factoring in the costs of running their business. To do so, insurance companies build their business model on twin pillars — underwriting and investment income. Make no mistake, insurance company underwriters go to great lengths to make sure the financial math works in their favor. The entire life insurance underwriting process is very thorough to ensure a potential customer actually qualifies for an insurance policy. The applicant is vetted thoroughly and key metrics like health, age, annual income, gender, and even clmpanys history are measured, with the goal of landing at a premium cost level where the insurance company gains maximum advantage from a risk point of view. That’s important, as the insurance company underwriting business model ensures that insurers stand a good chance of making additional income by not having to pay out on the policies they sell. Insurance companies work very hard on crunching the data and algorithms that indicate the risk of having to pay out on a specific policy. If the data tells them the risk is too high, an insurer either doesn’t offer the policy or will charge the customer more for offering insurance protection. If the risk is low, the insurance company will happily offer a customer a policy, knowing that its risk of ever paying out on that policy is comfortably low.
Comments
Post a Comment